On FDA’s Proposed Rule on Preventive Controls for Animal Food Facilities

FDA unveiled its proposed rule on Current Good Manufacturing Practice and Hazard Analysis and Risk-Based Preventive Controls for Food for Animals on October 25 after more than a year and half of waiting for the proposal to emerge from the White House Office of Management and Budget.

This proposed rule is of particular interest to me — as a veterinarian and a former director of FDA’s Center for Veterinary Medicine –and I think it has the potential to make a significant impact on animal health and to improve the safety of the human food supply.

The rule represents the biggest regulatory change the animal feed industry has seen in decades, with many companies becoming subject to new Current Good Manufacturing Practice (CGMP) requirements as well as hazard analysis and preventive controls for the first time. However, there will be added costs for companies required to comply with the new CGMPs and to develop preventive controls. With some exceptions, the proposed rule would apply to facilities that manufacture, process, pack, or hold animal food and are required to register as a food facility. So this will include a large number of companies.

Each facility would be required to have a written food safety plan, including a hazard analysis for each type of animal food manufactured, processed, packed, or held at the facility. The plan would also require preventive controls, monitoring procedures, corrective actions, verification activities and recordkeeping — all terms that are familiar to those of you who have worked with Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) systems, although the term HACCP is not used in the proposed rule.

The animal food rule will complement FDA’s separate proposed rules on imported foods and on the accreditation of third party auditors for foreign food facilities.

I am often asked if I think the agency will be able to meet its new court-ordered deadline of June 30, 2015 for publishing all five FSMA-related final rules. Because of the complexity of the animal feed proposal and of the other four rules, and because some of the necessary elements are beyond FDA’s control, I believe the agency will find it a major challenge to achieve the deadline. It is always a challenge to develop a new rule that must be properly supported by science and that must address the concerns of all stakeholders. So it would be unfortunate to have to rush through any of the necessary steps in the process.

The proposed animal foods rule, formally released in the October 29 Federal Register, is open for comment through February 26, 2014 and FDA has also scheduled several public meetings, one in College Park, MD on November 21, another in Chicago, IL, on November 25, and a third in Sacramento, CA, on December 6. I would encourage companies in the animal food industry to play an active role in this process because FDA is open to constructive comment on the proposal.

A Look at FDA’s Food Contact Notification Program

By EAS Senior Consultant Thomas Dunn

A food additive is defined in Section 201(s) of the Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) as any substance the intended use of which results or may reasonably be expected to result, directly or indirectly, in its becoming a component or otherwise affecting the characteristic of any food (including any substance intended for use in producing, manufacturing, packing, processing, preparing, treating, packaging, transporting, or holding food; and including any source of radiation intended for any such use); if such substance is not GRAS or sanctioned prior to 1958 or otherwise excluded from the definition of food additives.

For regulatory purposes, FDA divides food additives into two main categories: direct and indirect. Indirect food additives are food additives that come into contact with food as part of packaging, holding, or processing, but are not intended to be added directly to, become a component, or have a technical effect in or on the food. Indirect food additives mentioned in Title 21 of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (21 CFR) used in food-contact articles, include adhesives and components of coatings (Part 175), paper and paperboard components (Part 176), polymers (Part 177), and adjuvants and production aids (Part 178). Prior to 1997, all food additives, direct and indirect, were subject to approval via a petition process.

Section 409 of the FD&C Act defines a Food Contact Substance (FCS) as any substance that is intended for use as a component of materials used in manufacturing, packing, packaging, transporting, or holding food if such use of the substance is not intended to have any technical effect in such food. Examples of food contact substances include polymers (plastic packaging materials), pigments and antioxidants used in polymers, can coatings, adhesives, materials used during the manufacture of paper and paperboard, slimicides and biocides (antimicrobial agents), and sealants for lids and caps.

In 1997, the Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act (FDAMA) amended Section 409 of the FD&C Act establishing a “Food Contact Notification” (FCN) process that allows for alternative review of FCSs. The FCN process, administered by the Center for Food Safety and Nutrition (CFSAN), differs from the older food additive petition process in many ways. Most significant is the new program’s scientific approach to managing risk. With no sacrifice to public visibility or information access, the FDA has established specific process guidelines proactively detailing objective data requirements for manufacturing, chemistry, toxicology, and environmental aspects of the production and use of the proposed FCS that applicants must provide. When the applicant has provided FDA with all of the necessary data (the data requirements are described in guidelines published by FDA and are available on FDA’s website), the agency has a 120-day review period to evaluate the safety of the food contact substance as proposed. If there are no identified concerns, the FCN automatically becomes effective on the 120th day. Unlike approved food additive petitions where a regulation is entered into title 21 CFR, the FCN is then added to an Inventory of Effective Premarket Notifications for Food Contact Substances that is posted on CFSAN’s web page.

It is important to note that a food contact notification (FCN) is only effective for the manufacturer or supplier identified in the notification. Anyone who markets a food contact substance (FCS) based on an effective notification must be able to demonstrate that the notification is effective for their food contact substance. All persons who purchase a food contact substance manufactured or supplied by a manufacturer or supplier identified in an effective notification may rely on that notification to legally market or use the food contact substance for the use that is the subject of the notification, consistent with any limitations in the notification

FDA suggests that an FCN applicant discuss the proposal with agency scientists early in the application process. This allows the applicant and agency scientists to discuss the critical data requirements, test protocols, and validation procedures before either dedicates resources to activities potentially inadequate to support FDA’s assessment of public health risk posed by the FCS. Months of chemical and toxicological testing may well precede the 120 day FDA review.

In more than 14 years of existence, the FCN program has processed and listed almost 1,300 substances. The listing includes the FCS, the supplier’s name, the manufacturer of the FCS, the intended use, the limitations on the conditions of use for the FCS and its specifications, the effective date, and FDAs environmental decision. Successful completion of all the data requirements for complete submission involves a thorough understanding of FDA’s administrative process and the data needs of the agency’s scientific risk assessment.

EAS Consulting Group can assist you in preparing and submitting FCNs to FDA. EAS has a large group of professionals on its staff with years of previous experience working for FDA and other government agencies and industries. Please feel free to contact us to discuss your needs and our services.